Week 4 - Economics of Giving it Away

This is what the tech bubble of the late nineties was, right? I guess I was unaware of the major websites we have been discussing in this class having any financial problems. I thought because there was so much traffic on these websites and just about every website other than them having links to their sites (search through Google, Tweet this, add to your FaceBook page, etc.) that the advertisements alone would bring in the bacon. Well obviously Twitter doesn't have any ads on it, but it took me awhile to realize the Twitter doesn't have ads. I just assumed it did. I think Twitter should charge companies to have official company accounts. I mean it is great to see what is happening at your favorite companies, but they are getting the free publicity out of it. They are in business to make money and should help subsidize the rest of us freeloaders Tweeting.

When FaceBook launched awhile back (I think I joined in the end of 2003), I really thought it would be a college networking site and no more. Now that we have all these companies using FaceBook, and the like, as free advertising hubs, they should be subsidizing for the average user. I could see an argument for a site like FaceBook to start charging for application use, like the iPhone apps, but it probably isn't very likely because people are trained to get these for free. Plus a lot of the apps I see on Facebook are games and there are so many free gaming sites out there (my personal favorite is addictinggames.com).

Maybe we are just not there yet. Maybe television will be extinct as we know it in 5-10 years. I do enjoy Hulu. All these networks made billions by advertising, not by charging for their channel (OK well some of them do, but the big networks don't). Why would we even broadcast through the airwaves in the future, just stream everything via the web and have one place where everyone goes for their own tastes. Then the revenue dollars from advertising will be realized, and you would start seeing more subscription services (maybe even bundles for certain sites, like TV packages now). It is fun to speculate.

Week 3 - Charlie Rose and Twitter

So I think it is weird that I am blogging about the CEO of Twitter who is a co-founder of Twitter and Blogger, both of which we are using in this class. The video proved that you don't have to be an eloquent speaker, or even very confident about your product to be a CEO. It was difficult to listen to Evan Williams at times.

Other than that, I think Evan was on the right track when he was talking about what Twitter would be in 5 years. I think it will become more mainstream and more people will be used to tweeting and reading tweets. I had never used Twitter prior to this class and after about 2 days of using it for this class, I signed up my own personal account. Now I find myself adding news sites, sports teams I like, and other friends that I follow just to be up to date. With the amount of class I have had over the last two years, I always felt out of the loop. At least I can browse headlines just to keep up with the world.

I thought it was funny that they decided on 140 characters to fit in the 160 SMS limit. It is funny because he said that SMS text tweeting is not close to being the top medium for tweeting. I assume most people who tweet on their phone do it through the web browser or other app on their phone. Anyway, the program was short but could have been shorter (like 140 seconds) due to the painfulness of listening to Evan Williams stumble over his thoughts.